|
|
Post by venusboys3 on Aug 9, 2005 14:14:21 GMT -5
Well, I'm not exactly enthused about either name...
I'd mix them up a little...
Futures Unknown
Altered Tomorrows
But barring that...
I like Unknown Tomorrow best of what's offered.
Future Tomorrow is redundant and silly.
K
|
|
|
|
Post by jty3 on Aug 9, 2005 15:40:59 GMT -5
I believe that Rezolution miniatures game is called "A Dark tomorrow," which is close to Unknown tomorrow but better in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by LibrarianBrent on Aug 9, 2005 18:41:12 GMT -5
Uncertain Tomorrow sounds less pulpy to me.
|
|
kousa
Sergeant
kossupullo sille joka pys?ytt?? tuon tankin!
Posts: 296
|
Post by kousa on Aug 10, 2005 11:37:16 GMT -5
uncertain tomorrow would sound cool. but voted unknown tomorrow 'cause it's the best what was offered  |
|
|
|
Post by turtle on Nov 24, 2005 21:21:56 GMT -5
I think both of the names are way too long to be marketable.
Look at the successful games and movies these days.
Warhammer, Warmachine, Hordes, Dark Age, Starship Troopers, and Gearkrieg. Look at the video game industry too: Half-Life, Quake, Warcraft, Starcraft, Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, and Brothers in Arms.
If you notice a theme, most of those titles have only one or two short words. You have: "Alternate Events World War II - <Something> Tomorrow". That's a seriously large amount of sylables. Can you imagine showing this game at a demo and having to say all those words in front of players?
Better to make up a shorter word or just make up a word that sounds like it'll fit, then subtitle it.
Something like:
Alternate Events: Science Fiction World War 2 combat. Where Alternate Events is the main title that everyone will use and the rest the subtitle. One problem with this is that the word Alternate has many sylables.
|
|
